Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 27.06.2025 01:59

Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
What is the thing that the olden generation enjoys more than the modern generation?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
What’s next?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Why do narcissists and especially covert narcissists always play the victim?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Just in the last 5 years:
Yale’s new Google Home smart lock is here — but it costs more thanks to tariffs - The Verge
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Stocks to Open Flat as Trade Pact Details Awaited: Markets Wrap - Bloomberg
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
A nova is currently visible in the sky, and here's how to observe it - Notebookcheck
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
BYU could make noise at NCAA championship 'if big guns show up' - Deseret News
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
WWE monitoring US-Iran situation with two Saudi Arabia shows set for next weekend - New York Post